Not to stir this up any more than it already has but to tell the truth, at the time, I wish the CHARACTERS had had the debate that you two are having.
Originally Posted by ChastMastr
I find it hard to believe that all of these guys (and gals) were completely, fully agreed on the course of action taken. I assumed then that the writer feels a certain way, is convinced that his opinion is "right", that heroes do the right thing, so heroes did what he thought heroes would have done without really considering the other point of view.
I found some of the debates between Lama and Terror later to be among the more interesting aspects of the book. But in volume one, there's none of that despite having to make a decision that affects the course of the entire world. Yikes.